US Recall News

United States Recall News Alerts for Recalled Drugs, Food, Products, & Vehicles

MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About
    • Advertise
  • Full Recall News Archive
    • Top Story

      J&J Settles Talc Mesothelioma Settlement

      By Sandra Dalton, Staff Writer On January 6, 2020, Superior Court Judge Stephen Kaus announced that Johnson & Johnsons (J&J) had agreed to … [Read More...]

      Sandoz Inc. Issues Voluntary Nationwide Recall of One Lot of Cefazolin for Injection Due to Product Mispackaging

      Summary Company Announcement Date: June 27, 2025 FDA Publish Date: June … [Read More...]

    • More Safety Articles
    • Federal Preemption of State Product Liability Law
  • Drug Recalls
    • Abilify
    • Benicar
    • Fluoroquinolones
    • Invokana
    • Lipitor
    • Nuplazid
    • Opioids
    • OxyContin
    • Pradaxa
    • Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs)
    • Risperdal
    • SSRI
    • Symptoms & Side Effects
    • Taxotere
    • Testosterone
    • Uloric
    • Valsartan
    • Xarelto
    • Zofran
  • Medical Devices
    • 3M Earplug
    • 3T Heater-Cooler System
    • Bair Hugger
    • Bipolar Hip System
    • Essure
    • Hip Replacements
    • Implanon
    • IVC Filters
    • Hernia Mesh
    • Power Morcellators
    • Shoulder Implants
    • Transvaginal Mesh
  • Food Recalls
    • FDA Press Releases
    • USDA Press Releases
  • Auto Recalls
    • Air Bags
    • Ignitions
    • NHTSA Press Releases
    • Off-Road Utility Vehicles
    • Snowmobiles
    • Tires
  • Other Products
    • Asbestos
    • Baby Products
    • Pet Products
    • Roundup
    • Talcum Powder
    • Toy Recalls
You are here: Home / US News / US Advisory Panel Calls FDA Conclusion on Mercury Fillings Unreasonable

US Advisory Panel Calls FDA Conclusion on Mercury Fillings Unreasonable

September 8, 2006 By E. Sizemore 2 Comments


Yesterday a US Advisory Panel of 20 voted 13-to-7 that the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) conclusions on the safety of mercury-based amalgam fillings were not “reasonable,” and called for more research.

The US Public Health Service said in 1997 that data did not support claims that silver fillings caused serious health problems. The FDA meta-report analyzed new research since 1997 and reported that there was no evidence to contradict the original US Public Health Service conclusions.

A panel of outside experts met on Thursday to discuss the FDA report, and accused the FDA of not objectively and clearly presenting current knowledge about health effects of patient exposure to mercury vapors from “silver fillings”. According to the Illinois Department of Public Health “Exposure to even small amounts of mercury over a long period may cause negative health effects including damage to the brain, kidney, lungs…” Patients, consumer groups and some lawmakers believe mercury in fillings is linked to serious health problems like Alzheimer’s disease and multiple sclerosis.

The FDA and other health officials say the mercury vapors emitted from fillings are too small to cause such serious health problems. But panel member, Michael Aschner, professor of pediatrics and pharmacology at Vanderbilt University is not so sure. “There are too many things we don’t know and too many things we have excluded,” Mr. Aschner told Reuters yesterday.

Today there are alternatives to mercury fillings, including white composites made from quartz resin. Why these new, safer fillings haven’t completely made obsolete a type of filling that emits poisonous gasses is a mystery to US Recall News.

Image: Mercury Fillings VS Composite Fillings

– Editor’s Note –
I wasn’t so great about brushing my teeth when I was a child, and began paying the price in my early teens. By my 25th birthday, I had collected over a dozen silver filings. It was not until a year or two later that I was told by a dentist that these “silver filings” were actually mercury-based. Another year or two went by before I discovered while reading the original reports from the US Public Health Service that these mercury amalgam fillings released trace amounts of poisonous mercury vapors.

I have two questions:
#1 – When the FDA looks at vapors emitted by mercury fillings, are they only studying the effects from two or three fillings – like the average American might have – or have they also looked at the effects of mercury vapor emissions from long-term exposure to mercury vapors from over a dozen mercury-based fillings? Or maybe they have studied the effects of mercury vapor exposure in a vacuum, where the person wouldn’t be exposed to mercury from other sources. But what about those of us with dozens of fillings who also like to eat sushi, or who live in an industrial area?

#2 – Out of the many dentists I have seen and from whom I have received mercury-based amalgam fillings, why was I not told at least ONCE of the potential (even if slight) dangers of the treatment they were to provide? To expect a 13-year-old kid to understand the health effects of a commonly used dental treatment is ludicrous, unprofessional and totally unethical!

The two primary makers of mercury-based amalgams are Dentsply International, Inc. and Danaher Corporation (branded under Kerr Sybron Dental Specialties).

I might develop Alzheimer’s. I might not. But I might just take a former dentist, or perhaps one (or both) of the companies that make mercury-based fillings, to court and have them pay to remove every one of my silver fillings and replace them with a non-lethal material like the quartz resin used in white composite fillings.

And here is a note to my family in case I “forget”: When I develop Alzheimer’s, make sure you sue the pants off of every dentist who ever gave me a filling (because not a single one ever discussed with me the dangers of what they were doing) and both major manufacturers of mercury amalgams. Then you can afford to put me in a lush hospital with big screen TVs, a swimming pool, hot tub, golf course… I will be a vegetable, of course, but at least the place will look nice when you come to visit.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Related

Filed Under: US News

About E. Sizemore

Comments

  1. Susan Que says

    November 30, 2010 at 9:43 pm

    I am seeing so many stories across the country of people injured by mercury fillings. I nearly died from mine and I didn’t have that many. It is upsetting when any doctor claims illnesses to be psychosomatic. If you feel sick, then you are sick. I was repeatedly invalidated by the medical and dental systems until it almost caused me to die. The brain is an organ – it is does not reside outside the body. So if your brain isn’t working right and your body isn’t working right then something is wrong – both are physiological illnesses.

    Reply
  2. herman H White says

    September 28, 2011 at 2:13 pm

    I am 56 years-old. When I was in my 20, I had the dentist install the mercury fillings, six of them. I was never told about the composite fillings. And I was never told about the danger of mercury base tooth fillings. I now cannot drink or eat anything that is hot or cold for the pain that shoots from the mercury fillings into my jaw. I worked for the U.S. governemnt for 30 years as hazardous material tech. Mercury is a poison that must be handled with specials gloves and equipment to prevent the mercury from doing damsge to the body. Mercury has always being known as a poison. We need not to research, mercury is a poison that harms the body.

    Reply

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Facebook
Thomas Roney LLC
Economic Consulting

J&J Settles Talc Mesothelioma Settlement

January 15, 2020 By Advice Media

Sandoz Inc. Issues Voluntary Nationwide Recall of One Lot of Cefazolin for Injection Due to Product Mispackaging

June 27, 2025 By The FDA

Shang Hao Jia, Inc. Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Sesame in Danshi Brand Spicy Shredded Tofu

June 25, 2025 By The FDA

The Coleman Company Recalls Converta Camping Cots and Converta Camping Suspension Stretchers Due to Laceration and Amputation Hazards; Imported by Newell Brands

June 25, 2025 By The CPSC

Hero Highlight

J&J Settles Talc Mesothelioma Settlement

January 15, 2020 By Advice Media

DR Power Recalls Lithium-Ion Battery Packs Due to Fire and Burn Hazards

June 25, 2025 By The CPSC

Total Saddle Fit Recalls Western Saddle Cinches Due to Fall and Injury Hazards

June 25, 2025 By The CPSC

Professional’s Choice Sports Medicine Products Recalls Equine Bits Due to Fall Hazard

June 25, 2025 By The CPSC

LED Fireplace Lanterns Recalled Due to Risk of Serious Injury or Death from Ingestion Hazard; Violations of Federal Standard for Consumer Products with Coin Batteries; Imported by Green Pastures Wholesale

June 25, 2025 By The CPSC

Bell Sports Recalls Bicycle Helmets Due to Risk of Head Injury; Violation of Federal Standard for Bicycle Helmets

June 25, 2025 By The CPSC

J&J Settles Talc Mesothelioma Settlement

January 15, 2020 By Advice Media

LED Fireplace Lanterns Recalled Due to Risk of Serious Injury or Death from Ingestion Hazard; Violations of Federal Standard for Consumer Products with Coin Batteries; Imported by Green Pastures Wholesale

June 25, 2025 By The CPSC

Bell Sports Recalls Bicycle Helmets Due to Risk of Head Injury; Violation of Federal Standard for Bicycle Helmets

June 25, 2025 By The CPSC

Sanven Technology Recalls Vevor Handrails Due to Injury Hazard

June 25, 2025 By The CPSC

Recall News in Your Inbox

Enter your email address to receive automated recall news updates.

Recent Comments

  • Roger McGowan on ABH NATURE’S PRODUCTS, INC, ABH PHARMA, INC., and STOCKNUTRA.COM, INC. Issues Nationwide Recall of All Lots of Dietary Supplement Products
  • Kathryn Moore on FDA Wants Cancer Warning on Breast Implants
  • BRAD on Huge ATV Recall by Polaris – Sportsman and Scrambler
  • Crystal Anderson on Allergan Voluntarily Recalls BIOCELL® Textured Breast Implants and Tissue Expanders
  • Outsourcing Training on The Modern Marketing of Pain
  • SANDRA Collett on Processed Food Preservative Linked to Autism?
  • Eric Karsh on Health Risks of Roundup Go Well Beyond Cancer

Recent Posts

  • Sandoz Inc. Issues Voluntary Nationwide Recall of One Lot of Cefazolin for Injection Due to Product Mispackaging
  • Shang Hao Jia, Inc. Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Sesame in Danshi Brand Spicy Shredded Tofu
  • The Coleman Company Recalls Converta Camping Cots and Converta Camping Suspension Stretchers Due to Laceration and Amputation Hazards; Imported by Newell Brands
  • iHerb Recalls Bottles and Blister Packs of California Gold Nutrition Iron Supplements Due to Risk of Serious Injury or Death from Child Poisoning; Violation of Federal Standard for Child Resistant Packaging
  • Peg Perego Recalls Tatamia 3-in-1 Recliners, Swings and High Chairs Due to Risk of Suffocation; Violations of Multiple Federal Standards (Recall Alert)
  • DR Power Recalls Lithium-Ion Battery Packs Due to Fire and Burn Hazards
  • Total Saddle Fit Recalls Western Saddle Cinches Due to Fall and Injury Hazards
  • Professional’s Choice Sports Medicine Products Recalls Equine Bits Due to Fall Hazard
  • LED Fireplace Lanterns Recalled Due to Risk of Serious Injury or Death from Ingestion Hazard; Violations of Federal Standard for Consumer Products with Coin Batteries; Imported by Green Pastures Wholesale
-- See More Recall News

Disclaimer: The information contained in these topics is not intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical or legal advice, it is provided for educational purposes only. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified healthcare provider about any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Nothing contained in these topics is intended to be used for medical diagnosis or treatment.


ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. The information provided on this website is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by the use of this site. It is not stated or implied that a lawyer is certified as a specialist in any particular field of law. No results are guaranteed, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This site is informational, only, not dispositive; it is up to you to decide whether a particular lawyer is right for you. Use of this site is subject to your agreement to these.


Copyright © 2025 Altrumedia · Terms of Service · Log in