US Recall News

United States Recall News Alerts for Recalled Drugs, Food, Products, & Vehicles

MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About
    • Advertise
  • Full Recall News Archive
    • Top Story

      J&J Settles Talc Mesothelioma Settlement

      By Sandra Dalton, Staff Writer On January 6, 2020, Superior Court Judge Stephen Kaus announced that Johnson & Johnsons (J&J) had agreed to … [Read More...]

      Mondelēz Global LLC Conducts U.S. Voluntary Recall of Four Carton Sizes of RITZ Peanut Butter Cracker Sandwiches Due to Labeling Error

      Summary Company Announcement Date: July 08, 2025 FDA Publish Date: July … [Read More...]

    • More Safety Articles
    • Federal Preemption of State Product Liability Law
  • Drug Recalls
    • Abilify
    • Benicar
    • Fluoroquinolones
    • Invokana
    • Lipitor
    • Nuplazid
    • Opioids
    • OxyContin
    • Pradaxa
    • Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs)
    • Risperdal
    • SSRI
    • Symptoms & Side Effects
    • Taxotere
    • Testosterone
    • Uloric
    • Valsartan
    • Xarelto
    • Zofran
  • Medical Devices
    • 3M Earplug
    • 3T Heater-Cooler System
    • Bair Hugger
    • Bipolar Hip System
    • Essure
    • Hip Replacements
    • Implanon
    • IVC Filters
    • Hernia Mesh
    • Power Morcellators
    • Shoulder Implants
    • Transvaginal Mesh
  • Food Recalls
    • FDA Press Releases
    • USDA Press Releases
  • Auto Recalls
    • Air Bags
    • Ignitions
    • NHTSA Press Releases
    • Off-Road Utility Vehicles
    • Snowmobiles
    • Tires
  • Other Products
    • Asbestos
    • Baby Products
    • Pet Products
    • Roundup
    • Talcum Powder
    • Toy Recalls
You are here: Home / Medical Devices / FDA Warns LASIK Providers about Lack of Risk Information

FDA Warns LASIK Providers about Lack of Risk Information

January 8, 2013 By Candelaria Leave a Comment

On December 18, the FDA sent warning letters to five LASIK providers that they are failing to provide adequate information about risks to potential patients. This targeted follow-up comes after more than three years of communication with eye care professionals about failing to give consumers adequate information to make informed decisions about laser vision correction procedures, beginning in May 2009.

Providers Targeted for Misleading Advertising

The five providers targeted in this action were:

  • 20/20 Institute Indianapolis LASIK
  • Scott Hyver Visioncare Inc.
  • Rand Eye Institute
  • Eye Center of Texas
  • Woolfson Eye Institute

At issue are the advertisements and promotional materials of the providers, which the FDA says do not provide consumers with enough information about the risks, limitations, and possible adverse events associated with the use of lasers for LASIK.

The FDA press release does not specify any particular advertisements that should include more information about risks, but seems to indicate that all advertising and promotional material needs to include information about risks.

An example of how little risk information is readily available can be seen on the providers’ websites. Of the five providers censured by the FDA, only one—20/20 Institute–includes the word “risk” on the home page of the website. The word is included in a small type disclaimer at the bottom of the page: “All medical procedures have Risks and Benefits. Results can vary from patient to patient. Risks, benefits and probability of outcome should be discussed directly with your doctor.” On none of the sites is it clear where a potential patient should look for information about risks and adverse events.

Tighter Focus for the Same Message

Over the past three years, the FDA has narrowed its focus for industry communications, but the message has remained the same.

The first two communications, in May 2009 and September 2011, were addressed to “Eye Care Professionals.” In March 2012, the FDA sent two identical letters about the lack of risk information to specific ophthalmology societies, the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Now the FDA has sent letters to five specific practices.

In all the communications, the message is the same: there needs to be more information about risks and adverse events. More specifically, the FDA said in its May 2009 letter, referring to its regulatory toehold on the industry: “These lasers are restricted medical devices that have been approved for particular uses and have risks associated with their use. Advertising and promotional materials for FDA-approved lasers used during LASIK procedures must be truthful, properly substantiated and not misleading.”

In its March 2012 letters, the FDA added specific risks to its communications. According to the letters, “the FDA-approved labeling for every laser approved for LASIK includes” information about the following risks:

  • Dry eye syndrome, which can be severe
  • The possible need for glasses or contact lenses after surgery
  • Potentially debilitating halos, glare, starbursts, and double vision
  • Loss of vision

The letters also make the clear statement that “FDA recommends the inclusion of this risk information in all advertising and promotional materials for FDA-approved lasers used for LASIK.”

Future Actions

The FDA has promised that if the practices do not respond adequately to this letter, it will pursue additional action, which may include:

  • Seizure of misbranded devices
  • Injunctions against the use of devices
  • Monetary fines

These actions are consistent with the FDA’s earlier statements that these actions may follow warning letters.

The FDA did not publicly specify a time frame for future enforcement actions.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Related

Filed Under: Medical Devices, US News

About Candelaria

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Facebook
Thomas Roney LLC
Economic Consulting

J&J Settles Talc Mesothelioma Settlement

January 15, 2020 By Advice Media

Mondelēz Global LLC Conducts U.S. Voluntary Recall of Four Carton Sizes of RITZ Peanut Butter Cracker Sandwiches Due to Labeling Error

July 8, 2025 By The FDA

509 Recalls Helmets Due to Risk of Head Injury

July 2, 2025 By The CPSC

SNLN Party Supply Toys Recalled Due to Ingestion Hazard; Risk of Serious Injury or Death; Federal Toy Standard Violation; Sold Exclusively on Amazon by Yiwu Dixikeji Douxiangongsi

July 2, 2025 By The CPSC

Hero Highlight

J&J Settles Talc Mesothelioma Settlement

January 15, 2020 By Advice Media

Trane Recalls Gas/Electric Packaged Units Due to Risk of Gas Leak, Fire Hazard

July 2, 2025 By The CPSC

Jeriflyer Pool Drain Covers Recalled Due to Risk of Serious Injury or Death from Entrapment Hazard; Violation of the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act; Sold on Amazon by Junjuanshop

July 2, 2025 By The CPSC

Positec Recalls Electric Corded Chainsaws and Pole Saws Due to Laceration Hazard

July 2, 2025 By The CPSC

Sandoz Inc. Issues Voluntary Nationwide Recall of One Lot of Cefazolin for Injection Due to Product Mispackaging

June 27, 2025 By The FDA

Shang Hao Jia, Inc. Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Sesame in Danshi Brand Spicy Shredded Tofu

June 25, 2025 By The FDA

J&J Settles Talc Mesothelioma Settlement

January 15, 2020 By Advice Media

Sandoz Inc. Issues Voluntary Nationwide Recall of One Lot of Cefazolin for Injection Due to Product Mispackaging

June 27, 2025 By The FDA

Shang Hao Jia, Inc. Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Sesame in Danshi Brand Spicy Shredded Tofu

June 25, 2025 By The FDA

The Coleman Company Recalls Converta Camping Cots and Converta Camping Suspension Stretchers Due to Laceration and Amputation Hazards; Imported by Newell Brands

June 25, 2025 By The CPSC

Recall News in Your Inbox

Enter your email address to receive automated recall news updates.

Recent Comments

  • Roger McGowan on ABH NATURE’S PRODUCTS, INC, ABH PHARMA, INC., and STOCKNUTRA.COM, INC. Issues Nationwide Recall of All Lots of Dietary Supplement Products
  • Kathryn Moore on FDA Wants Cancer Warning on Breast Implants
  • BRAD on Huge ATV Recall by Polaris – Sportsman and Scrambler
  • Crystal Anderson on Allergan Voluntarily Recalls BIOCELL® Textured Breast Implants and Tissue Expanders
  • Outsourcing Training on The Modern Marketing of Pain
  • SANDRA Collett on Processed Food Preservative Linked to Autism?
  • Eric Karsh on Health Risks of Roundup Go Well Beyond Cancer

Recent Posts

  • Mondelēz Global LLC Conducts U.S. Voluntary Recall of Four Carton Sizes of RITZ Peanut Butter Cracker Sandwiches Due to Labeling Error
  • 509 Recalls Helmets Due to Risk of Head Injury
  • SNLN Party Supply Toys Recalled Due to Ingestion Hazard; Risk of Serious Injury or Death; Federal Toy Standard Violation; Sold Exclusively on Amazon by Yiwu Dixikeji Douxiangongsi
  • Harbor Freight Tools Recalls Predator 2000-Watt Power Stations Due to Shock Hazard
  • DEWALT Recalls Grinder Flap Discs Due to Laceration and Injury Hazards
  • Trane Recalls Gas/Electric Packaged Units Due to Risk of Gas Leak, Fire Hazard
  • Jeriflyer Pool Drain Covers Recalled Due to Risk of Serious Injury or Death from Entrapment Hazard; Violation of the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act; Sold on Amazon by Junjuanshop
  • Positec Recalls Electric Corded Chainsaws and Pole Saws Due to Laceration Hazard
  • Sandoz Inc. Issues Voluntary Nationwide Recall of One Lot of Cefazolin for Injection Due to Product Mispackaging
-- See More Recall News

Disclaimer: The information contained in these topics is not intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical or legal advice, it is provided for educational purposes only. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified healthcare provider about any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Nothing contained in these topics is intended to be used for medical diagnosis or treatment.


ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. The information provided on this website is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by the use of this site. It is not stated or implied that a lawyer is certified as a specialist in any particular field of law. No results are guaranteed, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This site is informational, only, not dispositive; it is up to you to decide whether a particular lawyer is right for you. Use of this site is subject to your agreement to these.


Copyright © 2025 Altrumedia · Terms of Service · Log in