US Recall News

United States Recall News Alerts for Recalled Drugs, Food, Products, & Vehicles

MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About
    • Advertise
  • Full Recall News Archive
    • Top Story

      J&J Settles Talc Mesothelioma Settlement

      By Sandra Dalton, Staff Writer On January 6, 2020, Superior Court Judge Stephen Kaus announced that Johnson & Johnsons (J&J) had agreed to … [Read More...]

      Joy Joy’s Bakery Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Wheat in Ube Spanish Bread, Ube Ensaymada, and Ube Roll

      Summary Company Announcement Date: January 26, 2023 FDA Publish Date: … [Read More...]

    • More Safety Articles
    • Federal Preemption of State Product Liability Law
  • Drug Recalls
    • Abilify
    • Benicar
    • Fluoroquinolones
    • Invokana
    • Lipitor
    • Nuplazid
    • Opioids
    • OxyContin
    • Pradaxa
    • Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs)
    • Risperdal
    • SSRI
    • Symptoms & Side Effects
    • Taxotere
    • Testosterone
    • Uloric
    • Valsartan
    • Xarelto
    • Zofran
  • Medical Devices
    • 3M Earplug
    • 3T Heater-Cooler System
    • Bair Hugger
    • Bipolar Hip System
    • Essure
    • Hip Replacements
    • Implanon
    • IVC Filters
    • Hernia Mesh
    • Power Morcellators
    • Shoulder Implants
    • Transvaginal Mesh
  • Food Recalls
    • FDA Press Releases
    • USDA Press Releases
  • Auto Recalls
    • Air Bags
    • Ignitions
    • NHTSA Press Releases
    • Off-Road Utility Vehicles
    • Snowmobiles
    • Tires
  • Other Products
    • Asbestos
    • Baby Products
    • Pet Products
    • Roundup
    • Talcum Powder
    • Toy Recalls
You are here: Home / Drug Recalls / FDA Warns Durata Quality Control Problems Could Lead to Fines or Worse for St. Jude

FDA Warns Durata Quality Control Problems Could Lead to Fines or Worse for St. Jude

January 17, 2013 By Candelaria Leave a Comment

Last week, the FDA warned manufacturer St. Jude that quality control and design problems related to the Durata ICD lead must be resolved within 15 days from the date of the letter (January 10) or the firm would face additional action, such as fines, seizures, or injunctions against selling the leads or other products. In a report to the Securities and Exchange Commission, St. Jude noted that the FDA letter did not specifically raise questions about the quality or function of the Durata leads, which it would continue to manufacture and sell.

A Troubled History

The Durata, like other similar leads, connects the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), to the heart, allowing the ICD to deliver life-saving shocks as necessary to ensure proper heart rhythm. However, the Durata has been the focus of increasing scrutiny for potential failures over the past six months, culminating in the recent action.

The Durata is St. Jude’s follow-up to its notorious Riata leads, which were recalled in 2011 because failures in insulation could lead to numerous unnecessary shocks or prevent an ICD from delivering a life-saving shock. At the time of the recall, about 227,000 leads had been distributed and nearly 80,000 remained in patients in the US. At the time of the recall, St. Jude issued assurances that the Durata design and manufacturing process were superior, although the company still insisted that the Riata was safe.

A study published in March 2012 linked Riata and Riata ST lead failures to 22 deaths due to insulation failures. This was followed up in October by a study showing that Durata lead failures were linked to at least one death.

Inspection Problems

In October, the FDA was finishing up its inspection of St. Jude’s manufacturing facilities in Sylmar, California. The October 17 inspection report revealed 11 separate multifaceted problems relating to the design and manufacture of the Durata leads. Some of these problems related to failure to follow internal processes, but many of them represented important deviations from best manufacturing processes.

The FDA told St. Jude’s to fix the problems or face additional action.

Problems Not Fixed

The FDA’s warning letter states that St. Jude’s responses to five items on the inspection report were inadequate. The problems included:

  • Performing inadequate inspections of products rather than ensuring the quality of manufacturing
  • Failure to monitor important aspects of a process
  • Testing leads only once, rather than five times as specified by their in-house testing methods
  • Making specifications to match the manufactured product rather than manufacturing the product to meet specifications
  • Failure to determine the effectiveness of corrective actions taken to alter the manufacturing process or even determine whether the corrective actions actually had a detrimental impact on the device

The FDA also stated that it considered the Durata leads to be “misbranded” because St. Jude failed to report malfunctions of the device to the FDA in a timely manner.

Although a spokeswoman for St. Jude said the malfunction reports related to leads that had not been implanted, one of the reports listed was cited in the original inspection report as being listed as “not implanted” when the device was actually implanted, then removed.

Recall on the Horizon?

Dr. Robert G. Hauser, the lead author on both the March and October studies criticizing St. Jude’s leads said that the failures they were seeing in the Durata leads were “a red flag” because they were similar to failures in the older Riata leads before they were recalled. However, some critics point out that Dr. Hauser did not compare the failure rates of Durata to those of other leads.

At this point, the FDA does not seem to be considering a recall of Durata leads and no one is recommending that these leads be removed. About 350,000 people have received the Durata leads or an updated Riata lead that uses the same insulation.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Print

Related

Filed Under: Drug Recalls, US News

About Candelaria

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Facebook
Thomas Roney LLC
Economic Consulting

J&J Settles Talc Mesothelioma Settlement

January 15, 2020 By Advice Media

Joy Joy’s Bakery Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Wheat in Ube Spanish Bread, Ube Ensaymada, and Ube Roll

January 26, 2023 By The FDA

ZLINE Expands Recall of Gas Ranges to Include 48-inch Gas Ranges Due to Serious Risk of Injury or Death from Carbon Monoxide Poisoning

January 25, 2023 By The CPSC

Properly Tied Recalls Children’s Lounge Pants Due to Violation of Federal Flammability Standards and Burn Hazard

January 25, 2023 By The CPSC

Hero Highlight

J&J Settles Talc Mesothelioma Settlement

January 15, 2020 By Advice Media

SkinnyDipped® Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Peanuts in a Limited Number of SkinnyDipped® Dark Chocolate Nut Products

January 20, 2023 By The FDA

Lifetime Brands Recalls Hot Chocolate Pots Due to Fire Hazard; Sold Exclusively at Williams-Sonoma

January 18, 2023 By The CPSC

Sakar International Recalls Multi-Purpose Helmets Due to Risk of Head Injury

January 18, 2023 By The CPSC

Vaenait Baby Recalls Children’s Robes Due to Violation of Federal Flammability Standards and Burn Hazard

January 18, 2023 By The CPSC

Vanessa Fire Tables Recalled Due to Fire Hazard; Imported by Ove Decors

January 18, 2023 By The CPSC

J&J Settles Talc Mesothelioma Settlement

January 15, 2020 By Advice Media

Vaenait Baby Recalls Children’s Robes Due to Violation of Federal Flammability Standards and Burn Hazard

January 18, 2023 By The CPSC

Vanessa Fire Tables Recalled Due to Fire Hazard; Imported by Ove Decors

January 18, 2023 By The CPSC

Children’s Pajama Sets Recalled Due to Violation of Federal Flammability Standards and Burn Hazard; Manufactured by Selfie Craft Company

January 18, 2023 By The CPSC

Recall News in Your Inbox

Enter your email address to receive automated recall news updates.

Recent Comments

  • Roger McGowan on ABH NATURE’S PRODUCTS, INC, ABH PHARMA, INC., and STOCKNUTRA.COM, INC. Issues Nationwide Recall of All Lots of Dietary Supplement Products
  • Kathryn Moore on FDA Wants Cancer Warning on Breast Implants
  • BRAD on Huge ATV Recall by Polaris – Sportsman and Scrambler
  • Crystal Anderson on Allergan Voluntarily Recalls BIOCELL® Textured Breast Implants and Tissue Expanders
  • Outsourcing Training on The Modern Marketing of Pain
  • SANDRA Collett on Processed Food Preservative Linked to Autism?
  • Eric Karsh on Health Risks of Roundup Go Well Beyond Cancer

Recent Posts

  • Joy Joy’s Bakery Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Wheat in Ube Spanish Bread, Ube Ensaymada, and Ube Roll
  • ZLINE Expands Recall of Gas Ranges to Include 48-inch Gas Ranges Due to Serious Risk of Injury or Death from Carbon Monoxide Poisoning
  • Properly Tied Recalls Children’s Lounge Pants Due to Violation of Federal Flammability Standards and Burn Hazard
  • Snack Innovations Inc. Conducts Voluntary Recall on a Limited Quantity of Drizzilicious Mini Rice Cakes 4oz & .74oz and Popcorn 3.6oz Products in the U.S. Due to Undeclared Peanut Allergen on Packaging
  • Almondy is Initiating a Recall of a Limited Quantity of Almondy Chocolate Cake with Daim 14.1oz
  • SkinnyDipped® Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Peanuts in a Limited Number of SkinnyDipped® Dark Chocolate Nut Products
  • Lifetime Brands Recalls Hot Chocolate Pots Due to Fire Hazard; Sold Exclusively at Williams-Sonoma
  • Sakar International Recalls Multi-Purpose Helmets Due to Risk of Head Injury
  • Vaenait Baby Recalls Children’s Robes Due to Violation of Federal Flammability Standards and Burn Hazard
-- See More Recall News

Disclaimer: The information contained in these topics is not intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical or legal advice, it is provided for educational purposes only. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified healthcare provider about any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Nothing contained in these topics is intended to be used for medical diagnosis or treatment.


ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. The information provided on this website is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by the use of this site. It is not stated or implied that a lawyer is certified as a specialist in any particular field of law. No results are guaranteed, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This site is informational, only, not dispositive; it is up to you to decide whether a particular lawyer is right for you. Use of this site is subject to your agreement to these.


Copyright © 2023 Altrumedia · Terms of Service · Log in