US Recall News

United States Recall News Alerts for Recalled Drugs, Food, Products, & Vehicles

MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About
    • Advertise
  • Full Recall News Archive
    • Top Story

      J&J Settles Talc Mesothelioma Settlement

      By Sandra Dalton, Staff Writer On January 6, 2020, Superior Court Judge Stephen Kaus announced that Johnson & Johnsons (J&J) had agreed to … [Read More...]

      509 Recalls Helmets Due to Risk of Head Injury

      The recalled helmets fail to provide sufficient protection in the event of a crash, posing a risk of head injury. … [Read More...]

    • More Safety Articles
    • Federal Preemption of State Product Liability Law
  • Drug Recalls
    • Abilify
    • Benicar
    • Fluoroquinolones
    • Invokana
    • Lipitor
    • Nuplazid
    • Opioids
    • OxyContin
    • Pradaxa
    • Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs)
    • Risperdal
    • SSRI
    • Symptoms & Side Effects
    • Taxotere
    • Testosterone
    • Uloric
    • Valsartan
    • Xarelto
    • Zofran
  • Medical Devices
    • 3M Earplug
    • 3T Heater-Cooler System
    • Bair Hugger
    • Bipolar Hip System
    • Essure
    • Hip Replacements
    • Implanon
    • IVC Filters
    • Hernia Mesh
    • Power Morcellators
    • Shoulder Implants
    • Transvaginal Mesh
  • Food Recalls
    • FDA Press Releases
    • USDA Press Releases
  • Auto Recalls
    • Air Bags
    • Ignitions
    • NHTSA Press Releases
    • Off-Road Utility Vehicles
    • Snowmobiles
    • Tires
  • Other Products
    • Asbestos
    • Baby Products
    • Pet Products
    • Roundup
    • Talcum Powder
    • Toy Recalls
You are here: Home / Featured / Alabama Court Rules Man Taking Generic Drug Can Sue Name Brand Manufacturer

Alabama Court Rules Man Taking Generic Drug Can Sue Name Brand Manufacturer

January 17, 2013 By Candelaria Leave a Comment

Since the US Supreme Court decision in Pliva v. Mensing barred most lawsuits against generic drug manufacturers, it seemed that people injured by generic drugs that lacked adequate labeling may have no right to compensation. On Friday January 11, though, the Alabama Supreme Court proposed a logical solution to the problem: people injured by generic drugs can sue the name brand manufacturer who is responsible for the inadequate label.

Who Can You Sue for Drug Injuries?

Two recent US Supreme Court decisions have clarified the rules for bringing defective product lawsuits against drug manufacturers. The 2008 decision in Wyeth v. Levine stated that name brand drug manufacturers alone bore responsibility for the adequacy of their labeling. Although Wyeth had claimed that it could not change its labeling without the approval of the FDA, the Court noted that the Changes Being Effected (CBE) rule allowed manufacturers to change their labels first and ask for approval afterward. This made it the manufacturers’ responsibility to ensure that the public was informed of potential risks as soon as they became known.

Then in 2011, the Court revisited the issue with its decision in Pliva v. Mensing. In this decision, the Court decided that generic drug manufacturers could not be sued for failure to warn or similar inadequate labeling claims because the law required that generic drug labels must exactly match the label for the name-brand drug. Therefore generic drug manufacturers did not have the power to warn the public about new risks. This apparently made generic drug manufacturers nearly immune to failure to warn lawsuits and left people injured by generic drugs without a legal option for compensation.

A New Precedent?

The current case centers on the same drug as the Pliva v. Mensing decision, metoclopramide, the generic drug based on the name brand Reglan. Metoclopramide is used to treat a number of digestive tract disorders, most commonly acid reflux, but in 2009 the FDA ordered all manufacturers to alter labeling for metoclopramide to include the risk of tardive dyskinesia, a movement disorder.

Alabama resident Danny Weeks claims that he developed tardive dyskinesia after taking generic forms of metoclopramide. He filed lawsuits against Actavis and Teva, the generic drug manufacturers who made the drugs he actually took, and Wyeth, the manufacturer of the name-brand drug Reglan.

The decision was filed in a federal court in Alabama because the drug companies in question are based out of state. The federal court asked the Alabama Supreme Court whether Wyeth could be sued in this case, and the court said, “Yes.”

Name Brand Drug Manufacturers Responsible for Labels

In its decision (draft available here), the Alabama Supreme Court cited both Pliva v. Mensing and Wyeth v. Levine. The Alabama Court cited the ruling from Mensing to stress the protection afforded to generic drug manufacturers: “rather than a duty to warn, ‘generic manufacturers have an ongoing federal duty of sameness’ regarding their warning labels” (indirect citation via Phelps v. Wyeth). The Alabama Court emphasized that this labeling restriction extended to all possible methods for a generic manufacturer to warn doctors, patients, and the public.

From Wyeth v. Levine, the Alabama Court cited language supporting the need for state-based tort claims in promoting the public good:

State tort suits uncover unknown drug hazards ad provide incentives for drug manufacturers to disclose safety risks promptly. They also serve a distinct compensatory function that may motivate injured persons to come forward with information. Failure-to-warn actions, in particular, lend force to the [Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act]’s premise that manufacturers, not the FDA, bear primary responsibility for their drug labeling at all times.

The Alabama Court then stated that it was “not fundamentally unfair to hold the brand-name manufacturer liable for warnings on a product it did not produce because the manufacturing process is irrelevant” when the actual issue is the warning label, which the brand-name manufacturer did produce.

Only in Alabama?

A lawyer for Pfizer, who acquired Wyeth in 2009, quickly dismissed the significance of the ruling, citing more than 70 court decisions in which brand-name manufacturers were protected from lawsuits related to generic products. He did note that two other decisions came to the same conclusion as the Alabama Court’s. He did not, however, note that the bulk of these decisions were made before Pliva v. Mensing, a fact that heavily influenced the Alabama Court’s decision.

Whether the significance of this case will have nationwide influence or if it will remain an Alabama phenomenon remains to be seen.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Related

Filed Under: Featured, US News

About Candelaria

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Facebook
Thomas Roney LLC
Economic Consulting

J&J Settles Talc Mesothelioma Settlement

January 15, 2020 By Advice Media

509 Recalls Helmets Due to Risk of Head Injury

July 2, 2025 By The CPSC

SNLN Party Supply Toys Recalled Due to Ingestion Hazard; Risk of Serious Injury or Death; Federal Toy Standard Violation; Sold Exclusively on Amazon by Yiwu Dixikeji Douxiangongsi

July 2, 2025 By The CPSC

Harbor Freight Tools Recalls Predator 2000-Watt Power Stations Due to Shock Hazard

July 2, 2025 By The CPSC

Hero Highlight

J&J Settles Talc Mesothelioma Settlement

January 15, 2020 By Advice Media

Jeriflyer Pool Drain Covers Recalled Due to Risk of Serious Injury or Death from Entrapment Hazard; Violation of the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act; Sold on Amazon by Junjuanshop

July 2, 2025 By The CPSC

Positec Recalls Electric Corded Chainsaws and Pole Saws Due to Laceration Hazard

July 2, 2025 By The CPSC

Sandoz Inc. Issues Voluntary Nationwide Recall of One Lot of Cefazolin for Injection Due to Product Mispackaging

June 27, 2025 By The FDA

Shang Hao Jia, Inc. Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Sesame in Danshi Brand Spicy Shredded Tofu

June 25, 2025 By The FDA

The Coleman Company Recalls Converta Camping Cots and Converta Camping Suspension Stretchers Due to Laceration and Amputation Hazards; Imported by Newell Brands

June 25, 2025 By The CPSC

J&J Settles Talc Mesothelioma Settlement

January 15, 2020 By Advice Media

Shang Hao Jia, Inc. Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Sesame in Danshi Brand Spicy Shredded Tofu

June 25, 2025 By The FDA

The Coleman Company Recalls Converta Camping Cots and Converta Camping Suspension Stretchers Due to Laceration and Amputation Hazards; Imported by Newell Brands

June 25, 2025 By The CPSC

iHerb Recalls Bottles and Blister Packs of California Gold Nutrition Iron Supplements Due to Risk of Serious Injury or Death from Child Poisoning; Violation of Federal Standard for Child Resistant Packaging

June 25, 2025 By The CPSC

Recall News in Your Inbox

Enter your email address to receive automated recall news updates.

Recent Comments

  • Roger McGowan on ABH NATURE’S PRODUCTS, INC, ABH PHARMA, INC., and STOCKNUTRA.COM, INC. Issues Nationwide Recall of All Lots of Dietary Supplement Products
  • Kathryn Moore on FDA Wants Cancer Warning on Breast Implants
  • BRAD on Huge ATV Recall by Polaris – Sportsman and Scrambler
  • Crystal Anderson on Allergan Voluntarily Recalls BIOCELL® Textured Breast Implants and Tissue Expanders
  • Outsourcing Training on The Modern Marketing of Pain
  • SANDRA Collett on Processed Food Preservative Linked to Autism?
  • Eric Karsh on Health Risks of Roundup Go Well Beyond Cancer

Recent Posts

  • 509 Recalls Helmets Due to Risk of Head Injury
  • SNLN Party Supply Toys Recalled Due to Ingestion Hazard; Risk of Serious Injury or Death; Federal Toy Standard Violation; Sold Exclusively on Amazon by Yiwu Dixikeji Douxiangongsi
  • Harbor Freight Tools Recalls Predator 2000-Watt Power Stations Due to Shock Hazard
  • DEWALT Recalls Grinder Flap Discs Due to Laceration and Injury Hazards
  • Trane Recalls Gas/Electric Packaged Units Due to Risk of Gas Leak, Fire Hazard
  • Jeriflyer Pool Drain Covers Recalled Due to Risk of Serious Injury or Death from Entrapment Hazard; Violation of the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act; Sold on Amazon by Junjuanshop
  • Positec Recalls Electric Corded Chainsaws and Pole Saws Due to Laceration Hazard
  • Sandoz Inc. Issues Voluntary Nationwide Recall of One Lot of Cefazolin for Injection Due to Product Mispackaging
  • Shang Hao Jia, Inc. Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Sesame in Danshi Brand Spicy Shredded Tofu
-- See More Recall News

Disclaimer: The information contained in these topics is not intended nor implied to be a substitute for professional medical or legal advice, it is provided for educational purposes only. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified healthcare provider about any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Nothing contained in these topics is intended to be used for medical diagnosis or treatment.


ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. The information provided on this website is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by the use of this site. It is not stated or implied that a lawyer is certified as a specialist in any particular field of law. No results are guaranteed, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This site is informational, only, not dispositive; it is up to you to decide whether a particular lawyer is right for you. Use of this site is subject to your agreement to these.


Copyright © 2025 Altrumedia · Terms of Service · Log in