<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford Recall History Puts Toyota Recalls in Perspective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.usrecallnews.com/2010/02/ford-recall-history-puts-toyota-recalls-in-perspective.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2010/02/ford-recall-history-puts-toyota-recalls-in-perspective.html</link>
	<description>Your one-stop-shop for information on recalled consumer products, pharmaceutical drugs alerts, health supplements recalls, recalled vehicles, automotive parts, boats and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:12:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2010/02/ford-recall-history-puts-toyota-recalls-in-perspective.html/comment-page-2#comment-25042</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=8511#comment-25042</guid>
		<description>How many Fords have caught fire since 1970? I can not find this answer.
Two out of six in my family. That is 33%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many Fords have caught fire since 1970? I can not find this answer.<br />
Two out of six in my family. That is 33%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2010/02/ford-recall-history-puts-toyota-recalls-in-perspective.html/comment-page-2#comment-25041</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=8511#comment-25041</guid>
		<description>Ford Owners Really Dumb. Ignorance and stupidly in the public is what keeps Ford in business. I once bought a x-cop crown vic at auction to flip, and it took over an hour just to get the dirt and sand out of the spark-plug hole to change the front spark-plug because of the poorly designed boot around the plug wire.
NEVER, NEVER, EVER BUY ANY FORD!
ASHES TO ASHES, DUST TO DUST, IF IT WASEN&#039;T FOR FORD OUR TOOLS WOULD RUST.
Ford - providing 70% of independent mechanic&#039;s business since 1903.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford Owners Really Dumb. Ignorance and stupidly in the public is what keeps Ford in business. I once bought a x-cop crown vic at auction to flip, and it took over an hour just to get the dirt and sand out of the spark-plug hole to change the front spark-plug because of the poorly designed boot around the plug wire.<br />
NEVER, NEVER, EVER BUY ANY FORD!<br />
ASHES TO ASHES, DUST TO DUST, IF IT WASEN&#8217;T FOR FORD OUR TOOLS WOULD RUST.<br />
Ford &#8211; providing 70% of independent mechanic&#8217;s business since 1903.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: delicia</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2010/02/ford-recall-history-puts-toyota-recalls-in-perspective.html/comment-page-2#comment-22667</link>
		<dc:creator>delicia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 16:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=8511#comment-22667</guid>
		<description>F-150&#039;s
Ford Motor Company announced Thursday that it has relented to a request from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and expanded its recall of F-150 pickup trucks, which have been the best-selling automobile in North America for the past 34 years.
Believe the massive advertising, stand-up for a corporation that delays recalls of defective parts. You won&#039;t be convinced, until the fire hit&#039;s close to home and you have to visit the morgue to identify your families burned bodies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F-150&#8242;s<br />
Ford Motor Company announced Thursday that it has relented to a request from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and expanded its recall of F-150 pickup trucks, which have been the best-selling automobile in North America for the past 34 years.<br />
Believe the massive advertising, stand-up for a corporation that delays recalls of defective parts. You won&#8217;t be convinced, until the fire hit&#8217;s close to home and you have to visit the morgue to identify your families burned bodies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2010/02/ford-recall-history-puts-toyota-recalls-in-perspective.html/comment-page-2#comment-22666</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 16:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=8511#comment-22666</guid>
		<description>Poor Kyle.
U took it personal, My Grandfather only owned Fords he loved them, 
I was only stating I like my Toyota, And it won&#039;t roll over if you know how to drive.
Saying I&#039;M Bias was referring to Harley / Toyota because I own both, (I believe in what I own) also Chev, 1970
454 Monte Carlo.
I did not try to Offend anyone, Just saying I enjoy what I have, If you like Your Ford
Then Keep it.
I&#039;M a firm believer in proper maintenance, will get any Vehicle a long way.
Also, Looking at buying a New Truck and Ford is on my list as well as Toyota, and 
a few other auto companies.
Once again, Just stating I like what I own.
Don&#039;t take things so personal Kyle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Kyle.<br />
U took it personal, My Grandfather only owned Fords he loved them,<br />
I was only stating I like my Toyota, And it won&#8217;t roll over if you know how to drive.<br />
Saying I&#8217;M Bias was referring to Harley / Toyota because I own both, (I believe in what I own) also Chev, 1970<br />
454 Monte Carlo.<br />
I did not try to Offend anyone, Just saying I enjoy what I have, If you like Your Ford<br />
Then Keep it.<br />
I&#8217;M a firm believer in proper maintenance, will get any Vehicle a long way.<br />
Also, Looking at buying a New Truck and Ford is on my list as well as Toyota, and<br />
a few other auto companies.<br />
Once again, Just stating I like what I own.<br />
Don&#8217;t take things so personal Kyle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Sizemore</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2010/02/ford-recall-history-puts-toyota-recalls-in-perspective.html/comment-page-2#comment-22664</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Sizemore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 14:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=8511#comment-22664</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not really sure how you equate Toyota bias to Liberal bias. Not all Toyota owners are Liberals and not all Ford owners are Conservative. You make some very great points later on, but starting it like that makes me not want to read them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not really sure how you equate Toyota bias to Liberal bias. Not all Toyota owners are Liberals and not all Ford owners are Conservative. You make some very great points later on, but starting it like that makes me not want to read them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2010/02/ford-recall-history-puts-toyota-recalls-in-perspective.html/comment-page-2#comment-22661</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 04:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=8511#comment-22661</guid>
		<description>Sorry 99.90 of the trucks are fine like mine correction</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry 99.90 of the trucks are fine like mine correction</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2010/02/ford-recall-history-puts-toyota-recalls-in-perspective.html/comment-page-2#comment-22660</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 04:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=8511#comment-22660</guid>
		<description>Gary good example of Liberal bias.  People notice the word usage Gary uses, if you Trust ford notice the capital case T in trust and the lower case f in Ford, ignorantly insulting one of the oldest automotive companies.  Then he describes Toyota with a capital T and uses the words reliability and beauty, pushing his thoughts of Toyotas false reliability. Talk about being bias in descriptive word choices. Then he goes on and on Ive owned this Toyota and that Toyota and even this Toyota all never having a problem.  Good for you Mr. Gary Toyota.  Your a fine example of the flawless Toyota owner, anything I own is #1.  I own a 1995 F150 bought it in 2000 had 132k on it, still own it and use it as a plow truck now and it has 496k on it now.  Also, owned a 1996 Ford Ranger retired it at 296k to a co-worker and he still has it, that was 4 years ago and his commute to work is about 92 miles each way a day so who knows what mileage it has now. Also owned a 2002 Crown Vic old squad car that had 390k on it had some problems but it had an abused life! Now I own a 2001 F150 and Cobra, the F150 has 69k on it now and the Cobra has 30K on it now.  Guess what you guys Ive never had any problems with any of these Ford products minus the abused squad car and general maintenance.

One last rant from me sorry, please tell me how Ford is responsible for the 1997-2001 gas tank straps and no other truck models are  (GM,Dodge,and Toyota even though they have similiar problems with rotting straps after all its a 16 gauge metal gas tank straps in a vehicle thats 10+ years old and 100k+ miles).  These vehicles are 10 plus years old, at what point is the government going to stop forcing recalls on companies.  These are trucks that Ford doesn&#039;t even have to make parts for 7 years + is the cut off. How, is this a manufacturer fault isn&#039;t it called maintenance something the vehicle owner is responsible for.  Its a comon problem in all trucks.  I own a 2001 F150 and I check mine every service, its called taking ownerships.  OK lets see the government bought GM and Chrysler a couple months later Toyota is the worst company ever millions of vehicles recalled at the governments request.  Then Ford starts to do real good passing up both GM and Toyota in the US and then the government decides to force Ford recalls that are on 10+ year old vehicles the F150 and Windstar.  F150 lets see 300 problems (showing rust, rusted through or tank falling) in 2.7 million vehicles with majority of them in the 200K range. Thats not even a 1% problem its 1 tenth of a percent problem. That means 99.99 of the trucks are fine like mine. Low blow on both Ford and Toyota by Government Motors.
Oh and Gary your 2005 Sequoia is the second worst roll over vehicle second to GMs Blazer.  And your 1995 Camry is probably due for an engine due to sludging, very common problem that was never a recall. And the Corolla you might want to set the toe to the right to compensate for the horrible left pull into on comming traffic that Corollas have never had to fix since day one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary good example of Liberal bias.  People notice the word usage Gary uses, if you Trust ford notice the capital case T in trust and the lower case f in Ford, ignorantly insulting one of the oldest automotive companies.  Then he describes Toyota with a capital T and uses the words reliability and beauty, pushing his thoughts of Toyotas false reliability. Talk about being bias in descriptive word choices. Then he goes on and on Ive owned this Toyota and that Toyota and even this Toyota all never having a problem.  Good for you Mr. Gary Toyota.  Your a fine example of the flawless Toyota owner, anything I own is #1.  I own a 1995 F150 bought it in 2000 had 132k on it, still own it and use it as a plow truck now and it has 496k on it now.  Also, owned a 1996 Ford Ranger retired it at 296k to a co-worker and he still has it, that was 4 years ago and his commute to work is about 92 miles each way a day so who knows what mileage it has now. Also owned a 2002 Crown Vic old squad car that had 390k on it had some problems but it had an abused life! Now I own a 2001 F150 and Cobra, the F150 has 69k on it now and the Cobra has 30K on it now.  Guess what you guys Ive never had any problems with any of these Ford products minus the abused squad car and general maintenance.</p>
<p>One last rant from me sorry, please tell me how Ford is responsible for the 1997-2001 gas tank straps and no other truck models are  (GM,Dodge,and Toyota even though they have similiar problems with rotting straps after all its a 16 gauge metal gas tank straps in a vehicle thats 10+ years old and 100k+ miles).  These vehicles are 10 plus years old, at what point is the government going to stop forcing recalls on companies.  These are trucks that Ford doesn&#8217;t even have to make parts for 7 years + is the cut off. How, is this a manufacturer fault isn&#8217;t it called maintenance something the vehicle owner is responsible for.  Its a comon problem in all trucks.  I own a 2001 F150 and I check mine every service, its called taking ownerships.  OK lets see the government bought GM and Chrysler a couple months later Toyota is the worst company ever millions of vehicles recalled at the governments request.  Then Ford starts to do real good passing up both GM and Toyota in the US and then the government decides to force Ford recalls that are on 10+ year old vehicles the F150 and Windstar.  F150 lets see 300 problems (showing rust, rusted through or tank falling) in 2.7 million vehicles with majority of them in the 200K range. Thats not even a 1% problem its 1 tenth of a percent problem. That means 99.99 of the trucks are fine like mine. Low blow on both Ford and Toyota by Government Motors.<br />
Oh and Gary your 2005 Sequoia is the second worst roll over vehicle second to GMs Blazer.  And your 1995 Camry is probably due for an engine due to sludging, very common problem that was never a recall. And the Corolla you might want to set the toe to the right to compensate for the horrible left pull into on comming traffic that Corollas have never had to fix since day one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2010/02/ford-recall-history-puts-toyota-recalls-in-perspective.html/comment-page-2#comment-22584</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 01:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=8511#comment-22584</guid>
		<description>2005 Toyota sequoia !
No problems, 1 recall that they informed me of = Fixed.
1995 Toyota camry 100% no problems.
1977 Toyota corolla bought used had normal maintenance, 250 k miles
Gave to Son in law and he still drives.
If you Trust  ford then buy one, if you  Like the reliability of a Toyota and beauty
Then Own it.
Of course i&quot;M Bias I also OWN A Harley !!
I do know Toyota has always taken care of me.
Gary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2005 Toyota sequoia !<br />
No problems, 1 recall that they informed me of = Fixed.<br />
1995 Toyota camry 100% no problems.<br />
1977 Toyota corolla bought used had normal maintenance, 250 k miles<br />
Gave to Son in law and he still drives.<br />
If you Trust  ford then buy one, if you  Like the reliability of a Toyota and beauty<br />
Then Own it.<br />
Of course i&#8221;M Bias I also OWN A Harley !!<br />
I do know Toyota has always taken care of me.<br />
Gary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caer</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2010/02/ford-recall-history-puts-toyota-recalls-in-perspective.html/comment-page-2#comment-21608</link>
		<dc:creator>Caer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 04:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=8511#comment-21608</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m putting my post on several &quot;Make a comment&quot;  I want as many people as possible to know how Ford treats it&#039;s customers.  So sorry if you read this already.  


I HAD a 2003 Windstar 68,000 miles. Only owner. I did the maintenance required. Was garage kept for the 1st 3 1/2 years. The 1st week of Novemeber the dealer took it and said they would get the part in Jan 2011. They paid for the rental. This week they condemed my van due to the 2nd recall. My buy out is $9,000.00. The catch – the dealer pressured me to sign the papers right away. Once I did, I did NOT get a check. 5-7 days, longer if a week-end was involed, but I had to turn in my rental on Friday no matter what I did. Dealer said it was Corp’s rules. When I called Corp they said it was dealer’s rules. When I asked about the other people from the 1st recall waiting 3 months+ for their checks the reply was yes there were delays for the 1st recall buy out. That could happen again. I asked to please keep my rental until I get my check. They said no. It would cost them too much money. But now it is Friday and I have no car to drive to work or get my kids to school. I also have no idea when I will get my check. NEVER A FORD AGAIN!!! I get the van is unsafe. I get this whole thing was a very bad mistake. What I don’t get is how I had to give Ford a check to leave with my van in March of 2003 when I bought it, but now that they are buying it back(due to a major defect) they don’t have to give me my check until they get around to it. The papers said they had a fixed time frame for me to keep the rental. What about a fixed time frame to give me my money. Anyone have any ideas???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m putting my post on several &#8220;Make a comment&#8221;  I want as many people as possible to know how Ford treats it&#8217;s customers.  So sorry if you read this already.  </p>
<p>I HAD a 2003 Windstar 68,000 miles. Only owner. I did the maintenance required. Was garage kept for the 1st 3 1/2 years. The 1st week of Novemeber the dealer took it and said they would get the part in Jan 2011. They paid for the rental. This week they condemed my van due to the 2nd recall. My buy out is $9,000.00. The catch – the dealer pressured me to sign the papers right away. Once I did, I did NOT get a check. 5-7 days, longer if a week-end was involed, but I had to turn in my rental on Friday no matter what I did. Dealer said it was Corp’s rules. When I called Corp they said it was dealer’s rules. When I asked about the other people from the 1st recall waiting 3 months+ for their checks the reply was yes there were delays for the 1st recall buy out. That could happen again. I asked to please keep my rental until I get my check. They said no. It would cost them too much money. But now it is Friday and I have no car to drive to work or get my kids to school. I also have no idea when I will get my check. NEVER A FORD AGAIN!!! I get the van is unsafe. I get this whole thing was a very bad mistake. What I don’t get is how I had to give Ford a check to leave with my van in March of 2003 when I bought it, but now that they are buying it back(due to a major defect) they don’t have to give me my check until they get around to it. The papers said they had a fixed time frame for me to keep the rental. What about a fixed time frame to give me my money. Anyone have any ideas???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2010/02/ford-recall-history-puts-toyota-recalls-in-perspective.html/comment-page-2#comment-20510</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 01:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=8511#comment-20510</guid>
		<description>Dear Stephen and readers;

You are ill informed about the findings that you have read in your autoblog.  You are referring to the Department of energy&#039;s Advanced Technology Vehicle&#039;s Manufacturing Program not the bailout money that the government has given to Chrysler and General Motors. These are conditional loan commitments that the government has given to the D.O.E  (a total net worth of 25 billion) which is avaliable to any auto manufacturer or auto parts producer that builds in the U.S (which include US automakers, US manufacturing subsidiaries of non-US-based companies, major US auto parts suppliers, and innovative startups). 

The D.O.E gets applications from these companies and with the contents in these applications the D.O.E will award that manufacturer a conditional loan (the companies that have the best ideas that will make vehicles 25% more fuel efficient than 2005 standards shall be rewarded a loan by the D.O.E)

So far Ford 5.9 billion, Nissan USA 1.6 billion, Tesla 465 million and  Fisker 529 along with others like Tenneco with lower granted loan numbers.  This is a loan not a bailout, the D.O.E has about 17 billion of the 25 billion to award still.

Ford got a big piece because they are revamping facilities across 5 states and they are driving a major upgrade, which include a tone of technologies like the direct injected turbocharged EcoBoost engines (2,4,6 cylinder engines) advanced transmissions, and new hybrid technologies along with revamped combustion engines and hydrogen and electric vehicles etc....  All these are leaps and bounds above what any other manufacturer is offering or has offered.
And they are already implementing them for example not like G.M sitting on the Volt for 10 years.

Again General Motors and Chrysler are the only companies that took the 25 billion dollar bailout package and then another 40 billion bailout package. Ford did not take any of this bailout money.  Ford did attend the 2008 court hearings because they where planning on buying General Motors if the government was not going to help General Motors or Chrysler.  Alan Mulallay Cheif CEO of Ford came out and said they would buy General Motors before it dissolved or Toyota bought them.

Also, of the 271 deaths you mentioned related to the Firestone/Ford deal 130 of these deaths where directly related to tire failures and the other 141 where related to speeding (80+mph) with aggressive menouvers at these speeds proven with on board computers, lack of maintenance proven with no vehicle maintenance histories through dealers or aftermarket shops.  Also deaths and injuries totalled 700.  Now these numbers vary depending on surveys and my heart goes out to those who have lost ones these are just the most common numbers reported.  Now given the quantity of vehicles that where sold during those years F-series where 800,000+ units a year and Explorers where around 250,000 units a year are actually very low compared to Toyota.  During these Toyota problem years Camary sales are about 250,000 units a year, Corolla&#039;s about 150,000 units.  So by recall/production/death+injury number ratios Ford is far less than Toyota (based on 90+Toyota related deaths and climbing).

Last but not least Toyota Camry/Solara is the best selling car not vehicle in the U.S. and its not AMERICAN. The Ford F-series is still #1 with Silverado in #2 spot and the the Camry taking #3.  The F-series outsells the Camry by 200,000+ units yearly while the Silverado outsells the Camry by 100,000+ units yearly.

So Buy American built by an American Company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Stephen and readers;</p>
<p>You are ill informed about the findings that you have read in your autoblog.  You are referring to the Department of energy&#8217;s Advanced Technology Vehicle&#8217;s Manufacturing Program not the bailout money that the government has given to Chrysler and General Motors. These are conditional loan commitments that the government has given to the D.O.E  (a total net worth of 25 billion) which is avaliable to any auto manufacturer or auto parts producer that builds in the U.S (which include US automakers, US manufacturing subsidiaries of non-US-based companies, major US auto parts suppliers, and innovative startups). </p>
<p>The D.O.E gets applications from these companies and with the contents in these applications the D.O.E will award that manufacturer a conditional loan (the companies that have the best ideas that will make vehicles 25% more fuel efficient than 2005 standards shall be rewarded a loan by the D.O.E)</p>
<p>So far Ford 5.9 billion, Nissan USA 1.6 billion, Tesla 465 million and  Fisker 529 along with others like Tenneco with lower granted loan numbers.  This is a loan not a bailout, the D.O.E has about 17 billion of the 25 billion to award still.</p>
<p>Ford got a big piece because they are revamping facilities across 5 states and they are driving a major upgrade, which include a tone of technologies like the direct injected turbocharged EcoBoost engines (2,4,6 cylinder engines) advanced transmissions, and new hybrid technologies along with revamped combustion engines and hydrogen and electric vehicles etc&#8230;.  All these are leaps and bounds above what any other manufacturer is offering or has offered.<br />
And they are already implementing them for example not like G.M sitting on the Volt for 10 years.</p>
<p>Again General Motors and Chrysler are the only companies that took the 25 billion dollar bailout package and then another 40 billion bailout package. Ford did not take any of this bailout money.  Ford did attend the 2008 court hearings because they where planning on buying General Motors if the government was not going to help General Motors or Chrysler.  Alan Mulallay Cheif CEO of Ford came out and said they would buy General Motors before it dissolved or Toyota bought them.</p>
<p>Also, of the 271 deaths you mentioned related to the Firestone/Ford deal 130 of these deaths where directly related to tire failures and the other 141 where related to speeding (80+mph) with aggressive menouvers at these speeds proven with on board computers, lack of maintenance proven with no vehicle maintenance histories through dealers or aftermarket shops.  Also deaths and injuries totalled 700.  Now these numbers vary depending on surveys and my heart goes out to those who have lost ones these are just the most common numbers reported.  Now given the quantity of vehicles that where sold during those years F-series where 800,000+ units a year and Explorers where around 250,000 units a year are actually very low compared to Toyota.  During these Toyota problem years Camary sales are about 250,000 units a year, Corolla&#8217;s about 150,000 units.  So by recall/production/death+injury number ratios Ford is far less than Toyota (based on 90+Toyota related deaths and climbing).</p>
<p>Last but not least Toyota Camry/Solara is the best selling car not vehicle in the U.S. and its not AMERICAN. The Ford F-series is still #1 with Silverado in #2 spot and the the Camry taking #3.  The F-series outsells the Camry by 200,000+ units yearly while the Silverado outsells the Camry by 100,000+ units yearly.</p>
<p>So Buy American built by an American Company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2010/02/ford-recall-history-puts-toyota-recalls-in-perspective.html/comment-page-2#comment-20415</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=8511#comment-20415</guid>
		<description>The most American car Is Toyota Camry says car.com 
BUY AMERICAN !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most American car Is Toyota Camry says car.com<br />
BUY AMERICAN !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2010/02/ford-recall-history-puts-toyota-recalls-in-perspective.html/comment-page-2#comment-20414</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=8511#comment-20414</guid>
		<description>Ford trucks and SUVs, suffered manufacturing defects found to have contributed to crashes resulting in 271 deaths and more than 700 injuries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford trucks and SUVs, suffered manufacturing defects found to have contributed to crashes resulting in 271 deaths and more than 700 injuries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2010/02/ford-recall-history-puts-toyota-recalls-in-perspective.html/comment-page-1#comment-20413</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=8511#comment-20413</guid>
		<description>who says Ford does not nees government money is WRONG.

The car industry&#039;s second big foray on to Capitol Hill in the past decade? came in November and December of 2008, when GM, Ford, and Chrysler went to Washington for hearings on emergency financial aid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who says Ford does not nees government money is WRONG.</p>
<p>The car industry&#8217;s second big foray on to Capitol Hill in the past decade? came in November and December of 2008, when GM, Ford, and Chrysler went to Washington for hearings on emergency financial aid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2010/02/ford-recall-history-puts-toyota-recalls-in-perspective.html/comment-page-1#comment-20412</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=8511#comment-20412</guid>
		<description>Automotive Blog
Ford wants government money, too.
Posted by: David Welch on January 15, 2009

To hear Ford tell the story, the Dearborn (Mich.) company is the smart one that is getting its house in order and doesn’t need government loans like more troubled rivals General Motors and Chrysler. That’s mostly true. Ford borrowed enough in the open market before the credit markets froze up. But to say that Ford isn’t seeking a big chunk of Federal funds is a bit misleading.

Right now, Ford has says its future product programs qualify the company for up to $11 billion of the DOE’s $25 billion program. The company figures it may only get about $5 billion, though. GM wants $8 billion from the DOE loan program, which extends credit for projects resulting in better fuel economy. It can be advanced vehicles like the Chevrolet Volt electric car or to tool up plants for more prosaic fuel sippers like the Chevy Cruze compact. Others are seeking funds, too. Even tiny Tesla Motors wants $450 million from the DOE.

Adding in the $13.4 billion or more that GM needs from the Treasury Department to stay afloat and its borrowings are much more. The company will eventually be heavily indebted to the federal government. But Ford clearly needs a boost, too. And it’s no wonder. Not only are the new fuel economy regulations forcing automakers to retool many of their models, Ford has plenty of cash problems. In the third quarter, Ford burned $7.7 billion in cash while GM burned $6.9 billion. For the first three quarters of last year, Ford burned through $15.7 billion while GM went though $14.1 billion.

Developing new models and technology is a massive expense for carmakers. If the DOE agrees that many of Ford’s future models qualify for the program, it could end up borrowing more from the DOE than GM under the program. Bottom line: Ford’s problems are less urgent than GM’s issues. But let’s curb our enthusiasm a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Automotive Blog<br />
Ford wants government money, too.<br />
Posted by: David Welch on January 15, 2009</p>
<p>To hear Ford tell the story, the Dearborn (Mich.) company is the smart one that is getting its house in order and doesn’t need government loans like more troubled rivals General Motors and Chrysler. That’s mostly true. Ford borrowed enough in the open market before the credit markets froze up. But to say that Ford isn’t seeking a big chunk of Federal funds is a bit misleading.</p>
<p>Right now, Ford has says its future product programs qualify the company for up to $11 billion of the DOE’s $25 billion program. The company figures it may only get about $5 billion, though. GM wants $8 billion from the DOE loan program, which extends credit for projects resulting in better fuel economy. It can be advanced vehicles like the Chevrolet Volt electric car or to tool up plants for more prosaic fuel sippers like the Chevy Cruze compact. Others are seeking funds, too. Even tiny Tesla Motors wants $450 million from the DOE.</p>
<p>Adding in the $13.4 billion or more that GM needs from the Treasury Department to stay afloat and its borrowings are much more. The company will eventually be heavily indebted to the federal government. But Ford clearly needs a boost, too. And it’s no wonder. Not only are the new fuel economy regulations forcing automakers to retool many of their models, Ford has plenty of cash problems. In the third quarter, Ford burned $7.7 billion in cash while GM burned $6.9 billion. For the first three quarters of last year, Ford burned through $15.7 billion while GM went though $14.1 billion.</p>
<p>Developing new models and technology is a massive expense for carmakers. If the DOE agrees that many of Ford’s future models qualify for the program, it could end up borrowing more from the DOE than GM under the program. Bottom line: Ford’s problems are less urgent than GM’s issues. But let’s curb our enthusiasm a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2010/02/ford-recall-history-puts-toyota-recalls-in-perspective.html/comment-page-1#comment-20276</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 03:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=8511#comment-20276</guid>
		<description>I have been an automotive tech. for about 4 years now. Every manufacturer has issues.  For individuals to sit here and debate Ford or Toyota are just ignorant. Toyota is not even a full line manufacturer (No H.D. pickups or any full size vans) not to mention there full size cars are really domestic/european midsizes, not picking on them just pointing out facts.  Everyone prides Toyota&#039;s reliability, why their methods and principles are horrible.      
Now the Domestics have to deal with this thing called the automotive Union (not bad mouthing the UAW just pointing out more facts).  The average Domestic plant assembler makes about 70+ dollars an hour with all benifits included, thats at or over 141,400 dollars a year to each plant manufacturer, 11,783 a month to each plant assembler (with about 250,000 gross employees Ford).  Now lets look at the Asian home land payouts for plant assemeblers (this is the Asian UAW) its about 346000 yen a month with benifits (little benifits in which they have with very odd work schedules)  thats 26 dollars an hour on our 80 hour pay frame in which they actually work more so its really less an hour.  Thats only 4,128 dollars a month equaling 49,536 a year on our scale (with about 320,000 gross employees Toyota).  100,000 less than the average Domestic UAW.  Thats alot of extra money the Asian companies have to put to their reliability, infact they should have no reliability issues since they pay near zero import  tariffs (thank goodness for paying off politicians).  Thought Americans where dead set against sweat shopes? If you really are stop buying products made in them!!!!!!!!!!

Now for the people who say well Asian car companies make vehicles in the states. Look where, 90% of the Asian (and European) car companies build their plants in Alabama, why its cheap labor and most of them are non union and the profits still go back to Asian/European company not a American company.  Domestics have plants all over the states look at Ford dumping 100&#039;s of millions into a new Chicago union plant I wish Benz would do that. 

People stating that the big three copy Asian car lines is pretty funny.  Asian companies couldn&#039;t even build a car till the mid to late 1930&#039;s, thats 30+ years after the Europeans and Americans have been doing it successfully.  Then it took them about 46 years to build them somewhat reliable and correctly.  Lets face it there are not many 70&#039;s,80&#039;s even early 90&#039;s toyotas still on the road in comparison to the domestics and European imports ( I don&#039;t care if you have one I know someones gonna say I have one and its great in general).  Now lets think and see what type/model did the Asian car companies ever invent or perfect without copying, sedan no, coupe no, roadster no, pickup no, fullsize van no, mini-van no, convertable no, SUV no, crossover no, compact car no, sub-compact car no, hydrogen no, cng no, hybrid no no no, so on... they have not designed one model of vehicle all they have done is copied copied copied European and American ingenuity.  

All vehicles now, minus the hand built specialties are built to the same tolerances by robots not Americans or Asians or Europeans. Pontiac Vibe=Toyota Matrix, Ford Ranger=Mazda B-series, Ford Fuzion=Mazda 6, Dodge Charger=Mercedes E/ClS class so on (many many others).  How can the Pontiac Vibe get poor reviews but the Matrix was raved, the Ford Ranger is a reliable truck but the Mazda B series is a poor design, the ford Fuzion is the number 1 midsize and the Mazda 6 came in last or the Dodge Charger ranked reliable when the E/CLS where ranked unreliable.  What it comes down to is the ending spot of the dollar.  As an American I want my dollar to stop at an American company not go over seas. So America as a nation please stop, think and not rely on what others have to say including myself and especially the media/magazines etc...  The automotive industry is one of the last manufacturing bases the U.S. has and how do we support it we buy Nissans instead of Pontiacs and Olds (history gone) or Lexus&#039;s, Infinities (remanned Toyotas and Nissans), instead of Cadillacs and Lincolns  (remanned G.Ms , and Fords).  In reality the only cars that should be imported are the high end luxury one&#039;s since American and Asian compainies clearly cannot make them.  Asian car makers have always copied American/European ones and they will alway&#039;s copy them, there is not a place for copies in this world and there is no reason for second rate compainies to sell mimics of the originals in this country at a cheaper price grossing more profit and paying there employess less. Support Domestic or go High end Euro help save the originals, they&#039;ve been around forever enough with this cheap throw away stuff. 

Thank you and sorry for any grammar errors
By the way Ford never took any bail out money from the government they can but they haven&#039;t. Also NASA has helped Toyota and confirmed the cause of its problems but Toyota is still denying it and now they are recalling all of the same cars due to first repair not fixing concern and spring from wrong repair braking and poping out of place on the first gas pedal recall so the same 5million are comming back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been an automotive tech. for about 4 years now. Every manufacturer has issues.  For individuals to sit here and debate Ford or Toyota are just ignorant. Toyota is not even a full line manufacturer (No H.D. pickups or any full size vans) not to mention there full size cars are really domestic/european midsizes, not picking on them just pointing out facts.  Everyone prides Toyota&#8217;s reliability, why their methods and principles are horrible.<br />
Now the Domestics have to deal with this thing called the automotive Union (not bad mouthing the UAW just pointing out more facts).  The average Domestic plant assembler makes about 70+ dollars an hour with all benifits included, thats at or over 141,400 dollars a year to each plant manufacturer, 11,783 a month to each plant assembler (with about 250,000 gross employees Ford).  Now lets look at the Asian home land payouts for plant assemeblers (this is the Asian UAW) its about 346000 yen a month with benifits (little benifits in which they have with very odd work schedules)  thats 26 dollars an hour on our 80 hour pay frame in which they actually work more so its really less an hour.  Thats only 4,128 dollars a month equaling 49,536 a year on our scale (with about 320,000 gross employees Toyota).  100,000 less than the average Domestic UAW.  Thats alot of extra money the Asian companies have to put to their reliability, infact they should have no reliability issues since they pay near zero import  tariffs (thank goodness for paying off politicians).  Thought Americans where dead set against sweat shopes? If you really are stop buying products made in them!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>Now for the people who say well Asian car companies make vehicles in the states. Look where, 90% of the Asian (and European) car companies build their plants in Alabama, why its cheap labor and most of them are non union and the profits still go back to Asian/European company not a American company.  Domestics have plants all over the states look at Ford dumping 100&#8242;s of millions into a new Chicago union plant I wish Benz would do that. </p>
<p>People stating that the big three copy Asian car lines is pretty funny.  Asian companies couldn&#8217;t even build a car till the mid to late 1930&#8242;s, thats 30+ years after the Europeans and Americans have been doing it successfully.  Then it took them about 46 years to build them somewhat reliable and correctly.  Lets face it there are not many 70&#8242;s,80&#8242;s even early 90&#8242;s toyotas still on the road in comparison to the domestics and European imports ( I don&#8217;t care if you have one I know someones gonna say I have one and its great in general).  Now lets think and see what type/model did the Asian car companies ever invent or perfect without copying, sedan no, coupe no, roadster no, pickup no, fullsize van no, mini-van no, convertable no, SUV no, crossover no, compact car no, sub-compact car no, hydrogen no, cng no, hybrid no no no, so on&#8230; they have not designed one model of vehicle all they have done is copied copied copied European and American ingenuity.  </p>
<p>All vehicles now, minus the hand built specialties are built to the same tolerances by robots not Americans or Asians or Europeans. Pontiac Vibe=Toyota Matrix, Ford Ranger=Mazda B-series, Ford Fuzion=Mazda 6, Dodge Charger=Mercedes E/ClS class so on (many many others).  How can the Pontiac Vibe get poor reviews but the Matrix was raved, the Ford Ranger is a reliable truck but the Mazda B series is a poor design, the ford Fuzion is the number 1 midsize and the Mazda 6 came in last or the Dodge Charger ranked reliable when the E/CLS where ranked unreliable.  What it comes down to is the ending spot of the dollar.  As an American I want my dollar to stop at an American company not go over seas. So America as a nation please stop, think and not rely on what others have to say including myself and especially the media/magazines etc&#8230;  The automotive industry is one of the last manufacturing bases the U.S. has and how do we support it we buy Nissans instead of Pontiacs and Olds (history gone) or Lexus&#8217;s, Infinities (remanned Toyotas and Nissans), instead of Cadillacs and Lincolns  (remanned G.Ms , and Fords).  In reality the only cars that should be imported are the high end luxury one&#8217;s since American and Asian compainies clearly cannot make them.  Asian car makers have always copied American/European ones and they will alway&#8217;s copy them, there is not a place for copies in this world and there is no reason for second rate compainies to sell mimics of the originals in this country at a cheaper price grossing more profit and paying there employess less. Support Domestic or go High end Euro help save the originals, they&#8217;ve been around forever enough with this cheap throw away stuff. </p>
<p>Thank you and sorry for any grammar errors<br />
By the way Ford never took any bail out money from the government they can but they haven&#8217;t. Also NASA has helped Toyota and confirmed the cause of its problems but Toyota is still denying it and now they are recalling all of the same cars due to first repair not fixing concern and spring from wrong repair braking and poping out of place on the first gas pedal recall so the same 5million are comming back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reggie</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2010/02/ford-recall-history-puts-toyota-recalls-in-perspective.html/comment-page-1#comment-20275</link>
		<dc:creator>Reggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 03:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=8511#comment-20275</guid>
		<description>The pedal assy. that Toyota used that had problems was made in the USA. The one that did not give trouble was made in Japan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pedal assy. that Toyota used that had problems was made in the USA. The one that did not give trouble was made in Japan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2010/02/ford-recall-history-puts-toyota-recalls-in-perspective.html/comment-page-1#comment-20271</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 01:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=8511#comment-20271</guid>
		<description>I see that many of these people writing letters are talking about the Pinto&#039;s from 1970 till the late 70&#039;s.
Lee Iacocca was credited as the father of the Mustang, but in reality, the only cars that Lee Iacocca was the father of was the Pinto and the Mustang II.  Iacocca was told from the start,  by Ford Engineers of the gas tank problems, but he was first a salesman, and he would like to use catch phrases.  HIs catch phrase for the Pinto was 2000 for 2000, wich meant 2000 pounds of car for $2,000 dollars.  If he would have been straight with Henry II, he would have put the parts in that would have rectified the gas tank probem, but that would have meant that the car would have to be sold for $2,025, and his catch phrase would have to be dumped in the toilet, so he ignored the engineers and sold the Pinto&#039;s as is.  FoMoCo had its problems in throughout the 70&#039;s but so did GMand Chrysler.  When comparing cars, the Pinto was in fact a better built car than the Vega, but because of Iacocca&#039;s ego, the Pinto took the bad press and it would up costing FoMoCo more money to pay off law suits than they made profits on the Pinto.  Henry II, was never an Iacocca backer, and the Pinto was the final straw that broke the camels back, that was one of the many reasons that Henry II fired Iacocca.  
The Big Three was lucky to survive the 70&#039;s, with cars that sputtered and often stalled out on the hiways, but entering the 80&#039;s, Ford got its act together and was the Number 1 selling cars and trucks, whle GM and Chrysler were still trying to get there acts together, thanks to the new President of FoMoCo, Caldwell.
Being number 1 is a hard thing to do, as GM knew as well as Ford, they both sat on their laurels and let smaller companies such as Toyota pass them by.  But Toyota fell into the same trap when they became number 1, and they produced dangeous cars but they didn&#039;t owe up to them, they tried to cover up their tracks, but got caught just like Lee Iacocca did.
In Lee Iacocca&#039;s book, he dedicated one small paragraph to the exploding Pinto&#039;s, but patted himself on the back throughout the book regarding the Mustang.  Lee Iacocca was a bean counter, and he would save money in other areas to show that the Company was in the black during his presidency at Ford.
Let us count where Iacocca was saving money.  He did in fact eliminate oil feed holes in the cam shaft of the Pinto&#039;s 2300 CC engine, and the small block 302, and I wonder why the cam shaft was always the first thing to go n the Pintoand the 302&#039;s?-  Iacocca would disregard leaking roofs in the factories, and the result was rusted machinery and dies that had to be junked.  There are many more things that Iacocca did so make himself look good, but it didn&#039;t get past HenryII.  Iacocca even had a fellow Allentown Paison by the name of Fragossi, who was a friend of Roy Cohn, the shyster lawyer, and it was Roy Cohn that tried to drag Henry II&#039;s name through the mud with false accusations against HenryII, which proved to be false.
Any Company is only as good as its employees, and if the head of the Company is a poor manager, it trickles down to all of the other employees.
Allen Mullally is taking Ford to great heights, and he is showing that he is a honest man, and that in turn is showing in the quality vehicles that are now coming out of Ford.  There is no denying that Ford is selling high quality and well engineered and styled vehicles, and their equity is some of the highest in the industry.  
I am proud of Ford Motor Company, since they never backed away from a fight since it was founded in 1903, and with a man like Mullally leading the Company, and mentoring Billy Ford, the Company will again be profitable and copied by all the other companys through the first half of the 21st Century, and I am sure that Old Henry I is smiling down from above to see that his company is again taking the right path.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see that many of these people writing letters are talking about the Pinto&#8217;s from 1970 till the late 70&#8242;s.<br />
Lee Iacocca was credited as the father of the Mustang, but in reality, the only cars that Lee Iacocca was the father of was the Pinto and the Mustang II.  Iacocca was told from the start,  by Ford Engineers of the gas tank problems, but he was first a salesman, and he would like to use catch phrases.  HIs catch phrase for the Pinto was 2000 for 2000, wich meant 2000 pounds of car for $2,000 dollars.  If he would have been straight with Henry II, he would have put the parts in that would have rectified the gas tank probem, but that would have meant that the car would have to be sold for $2,025, and his catch phrase would have to be dumped in the toilet, so he ignored the engineers and sold the Pinto&#8217;s as is.  FoMoCo had its problems in throughout the 70&#8242;s but so did GMand Chrysler.  When comparing cars, the Pinto was in fact a better built car than the Vega, but because of Iacocca&#8217;s ego, the Pinto took the bad press and it would up costing FoMoCo more money to pay off law suits than they made profits on the Pinto.  Henry II, was never an Iacocca backer, and the Pinto was the final straw that broke the camels back, that was one of the many reasons that Henry II fired Iacocca.<br />
The Big Three was lucky to survive the 70&#8242;s, with cars that sputtered and often stalled out on the hiways, but entering the 80&#8242;s, Ford got its act together and was the Number 1 selling cars and trucks, whle GM and Chrysler were still trying to get there acts together, thanks to the new President of FoMoCo, Caldwell.<br />
Being number 1 is a hard thing to do, as GM knew as well as Ford, they both sat on their laurels and let smaller companies such as Toyota pass them by.  But Toyota fell into the same trap when they became number 1, and they produced dangeous cars but they didn&#8217;t owe up to them, they tried to cover up their tracks, but got caught just like Lee Iacocca did.<br />
In Lee Iacocca&#8217;s book, he dedicated one small paragraph to the exploding Pinto&#8217;s, but patted himself on the back throughout the book regarding the Mustang.  Lee Iacocca was a bean counter, and he would save money in other areas to show that the Company was in the black during his presidency at Ford.<br />
Let us count where Iacocca was saving money.  He did in fact eliminate oil feed holes in the cam shaft of the Pinto&#8217;s 2300 CC engine, and the small block 302, and I wonder why the cam shaft was always the first thing to go n the Pintoand the 302&#8242;s?-  Iacocca would disregard leaking roofs in the factories, and the result was rusted machinery and dies that had to be junked.  There are many more things that Iacocca did so make himself look good, but it didn&#8217;t get past HenryII.  Iacocca even had a fellow Allentown Paison by the name of Fragossi, who was a friend of Roy Cohn, the shyster lawyer, and it was Roy Cohn that tried to drag Henry II&#8217;s name through the mud with false accusations against HenryII, which proved to be false.<br />
Any Company is only as good as its employees, and if the head of the Company is a poor manager, it trickles down to all of the other employees.<br />
Allen Mullally is taking Ford to great heights, and he is showing that he is a honest man, and that in turn is showing in the quality vehicles that are now coming out of Ford.  There is no denying that Ford is selling high quality and well engineered and styled vehicles, and their equity is some of the highest in the industry.<br />
I am proud of Ford Motor Company, since they never backed away from a fight since it was founded in 1903, and with a man like Mullally leading the Company, and mentoring Billy Ford, the Company will again be profitable and copied by all the other companys through the first half of the 21st Century, and I am sure that Old Henry I is smiling down from above to see that his company is again taking the right path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith E Gestring</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2010/02/ford-recall-history-puts-toyota-recalls-in-perspective.html/comment-page-1#comment-20270</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith E Gestring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 01:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=8511#comment-20270</guid>
		<description>The Govt is out to get toyota and fine them as much as possible.  What about ford on their windstars on the axles, they knew about this since 2000, no fines why.  The secy of transportation must be in bed with them, what are they doing your guess is as good as mine.  What about thje 800,000 of GMC the heaters for the winshield catching fire, no fine why?  Since Obama owns  PART OF GMC no fine, who is kissing each other ass.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Govt is out to get toyota and fine them as much as possible.  What about ford on their windstars on the axles, they knew about this since 2000, no fines why.  The secy of transportation must be in bed with them, what are they doing your guess is as good as mine.  What about thje 800,000 of GMC the heaters for the winshield catching fire, no fine why?  Since Obama owns  PART OF GMC no fine, who is kissing each other ass.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Erwin</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2010/02/ford-recall-history-puts-toyota-recalls-in-perspective.html/comment-page-1#comment-20269</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Erwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 01:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=8511#comment-20269</guid>
		<description>Dear Darin
  I really dont care to sit and sling poo all night however I work in Indiana ,building Toyota vehicles that we are prud of, please do me a favor and research the Ford Pinto scandal and how Ford decided to handle it.    thanks for your time  and even though I dont agree with your point I admire your Loyalty to your brand kudos to you and American Pride</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Darin<br />
  I really dont care to sit and sling poo all night however I work in Indiana ,building Toyota vehicles that we are prud of, please do me a favor and research the Ford Pinto scandal and how Ford decided to handle it.    thanks for your time  and even though I dont agree with your point I admire your Loyalty to your brand kudos to you and American Pride</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dale on the left coast</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2010/02/ford-recall-history-puts-toyota-recalls-in-perspective.html/comment-page-1#comment-20268</link>
		<dc:creator>dale on the left coast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 00:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=8511#comment-20268</guid>
		<description>Good Driver . . . . up until the big expose about 4 years ago . . . Toyota kept their recalls SECRET . . . Fact!!!    The memo released from Toyota headquarters braggin about how their bought and paid for NHTSA officials has stopped a large recall in 2005 and how it had saved Toyota millions . . . . kind of woke up the thinking folks.

Remember back in the late 80&#039;s . . . toyota V6 . . . every one blew head gaskets, sometimes more than once, took toyota 10 years to figure that one out.  Forefunners around here are called &quot;Flippers&quot; cause a quick lane change at speed will have them on their roof . . . I have seen it myself.  Only in the last 6 or 7 years have toyota and honda had five star frontal crash ratings . . . why???   Ford and GM had five star frontal crash ratings in the 80&#039;s and 90&#039;s.  
Trucks . . . Toyota trucks are the biggest joke on the planet . . . weak frames, gas guzzling 5.7 V8, Tundra worst in class. 
Where I live Ford is outselling toyota . . . . Hyundai passed Honda 2 years ago . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Driver . . . . up until the big expose about 4 years ago . . . Toyota kept their recalls SECRET . . . Fact!!!    The memo released from Toyota headquarters braggin about how their bought and paid for NHTSA officials has stopped a large recall in 2005 and how it had saved Toyota millions . . . . kind of woke up the thinking folks.</p>
<p>Remember back in the late 80&#8242;s . . . toyota V6 . . . every one blew head gaskets, sometimes more than once, took toyota 10 years to figure that one out.  Forefunners around here are called &#8220;Flippers&#8221; cause a quick lane change at speed will have them on their roof . . . I have seen it myself.  Only in the last 6 or 7 years have toyota and honda had five star frontal crash ratings . . . why???   Ford and GM had five star frontal crash ratings in the 80&#8242;s and 90&#8242;s.<br />
Trucks . . . Toyota trucks are the biggest joke on the planet . . . weak frames, gas guzzling 5.7 V8, Tundra worst in class.<br />
Where I live Ford is outselling toyota . . . . Hyundai passed Honda 2 years ago . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

