<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Warning on GDH-PQQ &amp; GDO Blood Glucose Test Strips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.usrecallnews.com/2008/10/warning-on-gdh-pqq-gdo-blood-glucose-test-strips.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2008/10/warning-on-gdh-pqq-gdo-blood-glucose-test-strips.html</link>
	<description>Your one-stop-shop for information on recalled consumer products, pharmaceutical drugs alerts, health supplements recalls, recalled vehicles, automotive parts, boats and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:36:41 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: G. Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2008/10/warning-on-gdh-pqq-gdo-blood-glucose-test-strips.html/comment-page-1#comment-6267</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=2082#comment-6267</guid>
		<description>T.....You are incorrrect and have certainly NOT done your homework.  The Bayer Contour meter is NOT AFFECTED by oxygen.  It may, however, be affected by Xylose, which would only occur during a Xylose tolerance test.  As far as accuracy without being coded, both Bayer products are extremely accurate and neither need to be coded.  Why add the risk of forgetting to code when there is no need?  Additionally, while true, only a small % of people may be affected by maltose interference, specific to dialysis, many more have the potential to be affected by galactose, which is a monosaccharide found in a vartiety of things such as dairy products as well as certain gums used in the sweetening process for thousands of things.  I am not a rep for Bayer, nor a diabetic.  I just know how to research a topic.  &quot;The More You Know....&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T&#8230;..You are incorrrect and have certainly NOT done your homework.  The Bayer Contour meter is NOT AFFECTED by oxygen.  It may, however, be affected by Xylose, which would only occur during a Xylose tolerance test.  As far as accuracy without being coded, both Bayer products are extremely accurate and neither need to be coded.  Why add the risk of forgetting to code when there is no need?  Additionally, while true, only a small % of people may be affected by maltose interference, specific to dialysis, many more have the potential to be affected by galactose, which is a monosaccharide found in a vartiety of things such as dairy products as well as certain gums used in the sweetening process for thousands of things.  I am not a rep for Bayer, nor a diabetic.  I just know how to research a topic.  &#8220;The More You Know&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2008/10/warning-on-gdh-pqq-gdo-blood-glucose-test-strips.html/comment-page-1#comment-6061</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 00:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=2082#comment-6061</guid>
		<description>J. Lantz - you have not done your home work - what do you mean by safer chemistry in regards to the Bayer and Lifescan meters. All glucose strips have interferences! Roche products have been put through tests that have eliminated 125 potential interferences during development. This is about 5 times above and beyond on interference testing verses other glucose monitoring systems. Interferences that exist with other blood glucose monitoring systems (like Bayer and Lifescan) acetaminophen, oxygen and ascorbic acid - which have been eliminitated in Roche products. 
So, what is safe? Don&#039;t be so quick to say that one is safer than another. Also, no coding does not mean safer or accurate it is a convieniance. Keep in mind that only .1% of the diabetes population is affected and those individuals are on specific dialysis that is in hospital settings.   
Your either a Bayer rep or do not research your topic at all. I am a life long diabetes patient and I study my products and know what treatments are out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J. Lantz &#8211; you have not done your home work &#8211; what do you mean by safer chemistry in regards to the Bayer and Lifescan meters. All glucose strips have interferences! Roche products have been put through tests that have eliminated 125 potential interferences during development. This is about 5 times above and beyond on interference testing verses other glucose monitoring systems. Interferences that exist with other blood glucose monitoring systems (like Bayer and Lifescan) acetaminophen, oxygen and ascorbic acid &#8211; which have been eliminitated in Roche products.<br />
So, what is safe? Don&#8217;t be so quick to say that one is safer than another. Also, no coding does not mean safer or accurate it is a convieniance. Keep in mind that only .1% of the diabetes population is affected and those individuals are on specific dialysis that is in hospital settings.<br />
Your either a Bayer rep or do not research your topic at all. I am a life long diabetes patient and I study my products and know what treatments are out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Lantz</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2008/10/warning-on-gdh-pqq-gdo-blood-glucose-test-strips.html/comment-page-1#comment-4949</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Lantz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=2082#comment-4949</guid>
		<description>Both Abbott (Freestyle) and Roche (Accu-Check) use this particualr test strip chemistry.  Only Bayer (Breeze 2 and Contour) and Lifescan (OneTouch) use the safer chemistry.  Also, the Bayer meters don&#039;t require any coding/calibration!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both Abbott (Freestyle) and Roche (Accu-Check) use this particualr test strip chemistry.  Only Bayer (Breeze 2 and Contour) and Lifescan (OneTouch) use the safer chemistry.  Also, the Bayer meters don&#8217;t require any coding/calibration!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Sizemore</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2008/10/warning-on-gdh-pqq-gdo-blood-glucose-test-strips.html/comment-page-1#comment-3121</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Sizemore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=2082#comment-3121</guid>
		<description>Richard, this is just a warning. It is not a recall. You can check the package insert that comes with the test strips to determine which type of reagent they contain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, this is just a warning. It is not a recall. You can check the package insert that comes with the test strips to determine which type of reagent they contain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard L. Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.usrecallnews.com/2008/10/warning-on-gdh-pqq-gdo-blood-glucose-test-strips.html/comment-page-1#comment-3120</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard L. Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usrecallnews.com/?p=2082#comment-3120</guid>
		<description>I am wondering where there is a list of the machines or strips so can find out which ones are recalled?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am wondering where there is a list of the machines or strips so can find out which ones are recalled?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
